Sacrificial Lambs 2012

Will Religious Freedom and the Unborn be the sacrificial lambs left in the wake of the Obama Administration? America has spoken with faith in a hypothetical fiscal plan based on historical assumptions (Clinton's supposed success - which, by the way, many still consider carryover of Reagonomics).

The faith bestowed now in O rests on the shoulders of the greatest abortion supporter ever to sit in the White House. While I can support trying anything for a better economy and a better America. I will continue to refuse to ever willingly to support the destruction of innocent life.

O and HHS tell us that we won't have to pay for abortion or abortificents in our Health Care. Such a statement is flighty. It is like saying that taxpayer dollars do not and will not be used for abortions while supporting Planned Parenthood with millions of taxpayer dollars for "mamograms" (which, again, PP does not perform). Those dollars are blood money.

Bracing for the Worst

Wannababies prays for the best outcome with the upcoming election, but recognizes that our fellow citizens have historically discounted "life" as a pivotal issue or neglect "life" issues altogether giving greater value to other issues.

Past elections have resulted in pro-abortion Presidents. None more so than our incumbent Prez.

With the risk to religious freedoms and coercion to force healthcare workers to commit abortions, the entire electorate becomes complicit in the deaths of millions of unborn. We did it in 2008 with full knowledge of Senator Obama's record. Are we poised to do it again?

30 Pieces for Pie!

Our "choice" is clear. One candidate is clearly "the pre-eminent pro-abortion supporter." Will we be complicit in the destruction of over 1,000,000 unborn innocent children each year?

Vote Life 2012

One vote is a certain death sentence for over 1,000,000 unborn babies every year in the US alone. This election is not only a matter of life or death, it is a matter for our very souls.

Human Personhood

One would think the term "human personhood" is redundant. No one can be the first without being the second.

In 1819, the US Supreme Court determined that a "corporation" must be treated with the same entitlements as an individual citizen. But, under the infamous Dred Scott case in 1857, African slaves and their descendents were determined "non-citizens" and not entitled to sue in US courts. Dred Scott was determined to have "no standing" to sue for his own freedom. Are you outraged?

The Court repeated the same error in 1973 when declaring "privacy" to trump the 1st Amendment "right to life."

Then, 1st Amendment rights took precedence when the Courts re-affirmed the "corporation's" entitlement to "free speech" as an individual in the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) case in 2010.

So, in the end, the First Amendment takes precedence (as it should). However, the Courts apply "personhood" to a fictitious entity in one case and fails to apply actual "personhood" to the more obvious unborn. Does anyone else see "conflict of interest" in these cases?

Impose Beliefs

The greatest cop-outs reach the highest levels of hubris. When VP Joe Biden cited:

"With regard to -- with regard to abortion, I accept my church's position on abortion as a -- what we call a (inaudible) doctrine. Life begins at conception in the church's judgment. I accept it in my personal life.

But I refuse to impose it on equally devout Christians and Muslims and Jews, and I just refuse to impose that on others, unlike my friend here, the -- the congressman. I -- I do not believe that we have a right to tell other people that -- women they can't control their body."

Why not just toss out the entire Ten
Commandments Joe? The very foundation of our common law is anchored in the Ten Commandments.

When pro-choice advocates cite their commitment to allow others to follow their own choice, it is a slippery slope argument at best. Of course, we all have choice. But, our choices dictate our path to God or away from HIM. The "choice" of taking another individual's life cannot be painted over with euphemisms or ever forgotten.

Do tell, what part of a mother's body is missing after having suffered an abortion?

Read more on the VP Debate: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/11/transcript-vice-presidential-debate/#ixzz29BtlaeiY 

From the Mommie...

Standard response when anyone one of my siblings and I were asked the question, "Where are you from?" Response, "My Mommie."

Typical of San Miguel family humor, but true today as it ever was.